It is great to see Indian Hills be the first school in the district to get the Exceptional rating three times. The staff, students and parents really deserve our thanks for their hard work
The district released an information packed Annual Report for 2006-07 with a page for each school. I think it is an exceptional way to get to know the district better and get up to speed on what the district has planned for the future.
Sunday, December 30, 2007
Argus Article: Keep It Together
'Keep it together,' parents ask school boundary committee members
12/24/2007
The Argus - To many, a school is the essence of community. A core group of about 20 parents again asked Boundary Committee members of the Hillsboro School District Dec. 17 to hold neighborhoods together by making wise choices on school boundary adju...
This is a good article by Lisa Cromwell, she is at all the working meetings and doing better than most keeping the various issues straight.
12/24/2007
The Argus - To many, a school is the essence of community. A core group of about 20 parents again asked Boundary Committee members of the Hillsboro School District Dec. 17 to hold neighborhoods together by making wise choices on school boundary adju...
This is a good article by Lisa Cromwell, she is at all the working meetings and doing better than most keeping the various issues straight.
Thursday, December 20, 2007
Community Meeting #5 at Century
Tonight's meeting was focused on the latino community but was bilingual so everyone could follow along. Plan 6 was presented but did not included detailed maps as have been presented for Plan 3.
There was good turnout with some comments from parents.
One parent expressed concern about some postings on the internet that were less than favorable towards an increase in spanish language students at Eastwood. He challenged the hispanic community to reach out and change perceptions.
There was also some concern about resources being available for ESL teaching and other programs like BLAST at Peter Boscow and the parent was reassured that the district would review those resources and make sure that nothing was lost in the transition.
Several other parents were concerned about keeping standards high for the kids and ensuring that school quality based on state tests was maintained - more of a general concern about really challenging hispanic kids in the schools. Mr. Pérez suggested that perhaps the district should bring the superintendent and some other district representatives back in another meeting to hear those kinds of concerns.
There were also some concerns about racism that might be brought out by school changes and what the district was doing to address the problem. Mr. Pérez pointed out that racism is a community issue as opposed to a school issue and that the district would make sure teachers had appropriate training to properly address any racism that might be encountered in the school environment.
After the meeting, one of the parents from Eastwood asked if we had heard the comment by the first parent and she wanted to reassure him that the school was an 'open arms' school. I think he was a little surprised when she approached him and (with some translation help from Mr. Pérez) expressed concern. The parent made it clear that he didn't feel that it was a reflection on Eastwood in general but wanted to make sure his children would feel welcomed at Eastwood.
There was good turnout with some comments from parents.
One parent expressed concern about some postings on the internet that were less than favorable towards an increase in spanish language students at Eastwood. He challenged the hispanic community to reach out and change perceptions.
There was also some concern about resources being available for ESL teaching and other programs like BLAST at Peter Boscow and the parent was reassured that the district would review those resources and make sure that nothing was lost in the transition.
Several other parents were concerned about keeping standards high for the kids and ensuring that school quality based on state tests was maintained - more of a general concern about really challenging hispanic kids in the schools. Mr. Pérez suggested that perhaps the district should bring the superintendent and some other district representatives back in another meeting to hear those kinds of concerns.
There were also some concerns about racism that might be brought out by school changes and what the district was doing to address the problem. Mr. Pérez pointed out that racism is a community issue as opposed to a school issue and that the district would make sure teachers had appropriate training to properly address any racism that might be encountered in the school environment.
After the meeting, one of the parents from Eastwood asked if we had heard the comment by the first parent and she wanted to reassure him that the school was an 'open arms' school. I think he was a little surprised when she approached him and (with some translation help from Mr. Pérez) expressed concern. The parent made it clear that he didn't feel that it was a reflection on Eastwood in general but wanted to make sure his children would feel welcomed at Eastwood.
Plan 6 Details on HSD Website
Plan 6 Presentation
Shows updated feeders and boundaries, Indian Hills with a 43 student increase (grades 1-6), same as Plan 3. Ladd Acres is restored to original boundaries, Butternut will feed to Brown/Century while Orenco goes back to Poynter/Liberty.
Butternut parents will be very upset, they wanted to stay as Hilhi Spartans but they spent the last few meetings complaining about Brookwood coming out of Hilhi. Now Brookwood is back to Hilhi and Butternut moves to Century.
Shows updated feeders and boundaries, Indian Hills with a 43 student increase (grades 1-6), same as Plan 3. Ladd Acres is restored to original boundaries, Butternut will feed to Brown/Century while Orenco goes back to Poynter/Liberty.
Butternut parents will be very upset, they wanted to stay as Hilhi Spartans but they spent the last few meetings complaining about Brookwood coming out of Hilhi. Now Brookwood is back to Hilhi and Butternut moves to Century.
Oregonian Article On HSD Boundaries
Here is the link to the online version Where Will They Go?
I think Michelle Trappen did a good job accurately capturing progress of the work by the boundary committee, the essential issues being discussed while graciously including a link to this blog.
If you find your way here from the Oregonian, I encourage you to check the following links:
Hillsboro School District Boundary Adjustment Page - Essential information on the boundary process including meeting minutes, future meeting schedules, latest boundary maps and community presentation material.
Straight Talk written by Hugh O'Donnell, a HSD board member since 2003 and retired HSD teacher. Visit to keep in touch with goings-on in the district from the viewpoint of an individual board member and thoughts on improving education in the district.
For those that haven't seen the paper, check out the center of today's Oregonian in the Washington County section. There is a big article by Michelle Trappen on the current status of the boundary process.
You need to go to the print version for a photo of the girls and I walking home from Indian Hills. They were a little freaked out by the size of the photo.
I think Michelle Trappen did a good job accurately capturing progress of the work by the boundary committee, the essential issues being discussed while graciously including a link to this blog.
If you find your way here from the Oregonian, I encourage you to check the following links:
Hillsboro School District Boundary Adjustment Page - Essential information on the boundary process including meeting minutes, future meeting schedules, latest boundary maps and community presentation material.
Straight Talk written by Hugh O'Donnell, a HSD board member since 2003 and retired HSD teacher. Visit to keep in touch with goings-on in the district from the viewpoint of an individual board member and thoughts on improving education in the district.
For those that haven't seen the paper, check out the center of today's Oregonian in the Washington County section. There is a big article by Michelle Trappen on the current status of the boundary process.
You need to go to the print version for a photo of the girls and I walking home from Indian Hills. They were a little freaked out by the size of the photo.
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
Last Community Meeting This Thurs 6:30p
Community Meeting #5, Final (bilingual)
December 20, 2007
(Thursday, 6:30-7:30p.m.)
Note earlier time than usual
Century High School (map)
2000 SE Century Blvd.
Hillsboro, OR 97123-8390
For more info on the process, go here (link).
Bilingual meeting, and the first to show a significant change from Plan 3.
December 20, 2007
(Thursday, 6:30-7:30p.m.)
Note earlier time than usual
Century High School (map)
2000 SE Century Blvd.
Hillsboro, OR 97123-8390
For more info on the process, go here (link).
Bilingual meeting, and the first to show a significant change from Plan 3.
Monday, December 17, 2007
Working Session #5: Good for Ladd Acres and Indian Hills
New boundaries were shown that will be presented at the bilingual meeting on Thursday at Century.
1) Apartments and condos at corner of Brookwood and TV Hwy go back to Witch Hazel anticipating space available with ES 27 coming in soon south of TV Hwy.
2) 'Portable' Ladd Acres neighborhood stays in Ladd Acres. (yay!)
3) Indian Hills boundary stays as presented in Plan 3, but loses the northern end of the add from east of 198th which now show as moved to Tobias. This was apparently done before the Ladd families were moved back to Ladd and likely will come back to Indian Hills, about 25 kids. Plan 6 shows us coming down to estimated 393 students from 507 in plan 3a, adding those kids will leave us just over 400 students, an add of about 2 classes to where we are now with the Copperleaf development gradually phasing in one more class over the next 2 years for a total add of 3 classes.
These changes depend on whether they will work out the new boundaries for ES #27 south of TV Hwy to include Ladd Acres families near Brookwood eventually.
Updated map, click to zoom (new map program so it is a little more plain)
Many other areas improved, hot spots may have been created in other places but overall a general improvement. I would be interested in hearing from Eastwood parents after the Thurs meeting on how they feel about the change.
David Hill came up again with the plan showing some going back to Farmington View but that was pulled back and likely will be the same as Plan 3.
1) Apartments and condos at corner of Brookwood and TV Hwy go back to Witch Hazel anticipating space available with ES 27 coming in soon south of TV Hwy.
2) 'Portable' Ladd Acres neighborhood stays in Ladd Acres. (yay!)
3) Indian Hills boundary stays as presented in Plan 3, but loses the northern end of the add from east of 198th which now show as moved to Tobias. This was apparently done before the Ladd families were moved back to Ladd and likely will come back to Indian Hills, about 25 kids. Plan 6 shows us coming down to estimated 393 students from 507 in plan 3a, adding those kids will leave us just over 400 students, an add of about 2 classes to where we are now with the Copperleaf development gradually phasing in one more class over the next 2 years for a total add of 3 classes.
These changes depend on whether they will work out the new boundaries for ES #27 south of TV Hwy to include Ladd Acres families near Brookwood eventually.
Updated map, click to zoom (new map program so it is a little more plain)
Many other areas improved, hot spots may have been created in other places but overall a general improvement. I would be interested in hearing from Eastwood parents after the Thurs meeting on how they feel about the change.
David Hill came up again with the plan showing some going back to Farmington View but that was pulled back and likely will be the same as Plan 3.
Sunday, December 16, 2007
Thursday, December 13, 2007
Community Meeting #4: Mark Finally Speaks
After sitting on the sidelines and lobbing out blog posts, I finally decided to comment (since it was the last official community meeting). Following were my spoken comments (note that I am just as wordy when speaking as I am when typing):
First of all I want to thank Mr. Pérez and the committee, this has been a very open and responsive process so far. I’ve been at a lot of the meetings and am impressed by the amount of involvement that they have allowed the community to have.
I also appreciate the consideration given to Indian Hills early in the process. There were many of us being moved out of the boundary that were very concerned about it and the committee listened and responded and we appreciate that.
It’s clear that Indian Hills needs to help relieve some of the pressure in neighboring schools. I think the school, the staff, the parents and the kids understand that and welcome, at a certain level, the opportunity to grow.
However, I believe that Plan #3A, adjusted, overcrowds our school – we look at the addition of the Ladd Acres families on the west side and the folks east of 198th and then this Copperleaf subdivision, which is just right across from Brown here. When I calculate it all out and add in Kinders, it looks like it is going to be 6 additional classes and it is going to take us to about 96 or 97 percent capacity or higher. We’re concerned that we’re possibly going to lose room for small groups to meet, we’ve got a computer room and a staff room that we would have to give up to accommodate those kinds of numbers.
Another concern is when we look at Quatama and where it is going in - it doesn’t feel like the other schools are getting good relief from that new school. I see the numbers in Orenco dropping quite a bit but don’t really see a movement of Tobias students over there to ripple the relief across to Reedville, which we know has been extremely overcrowded for many years. I think it follows through on the other side when we look at Brookwood and Eastwood schools which are right up, again, against the Quatama border - it doesn’t seem that any relief is propagating out from that new school, and that’s a concern.
When I look at slide 15, which shows the current numbers and future numbers, it’s very hard for me to make any sense from that because I know it only represents 1-6 graders, and we know there are going to be Kinders, it’s a number greater than zero, they are going to be in our schools.
The other thing that is missing is current capacity. The latest capacity data that I have been able to find is on the website and it is from 2006. I know that portables have been moved into some schools and so that has changed but it makes it very difficult for me as a parent in the district to really evaluate this proposal without knowing what the end result is going to be based on capacity.
What I’m looking for is some sort of official summary from the committee that includes:
1) current verified capacity. Does that include portables? Are those portables going to be moved? Are additional portables going to be moved in?
2) something that accounts for Kinders, it looks like it’s around 15% of grades 1-6. It seems like there should be some way to add that into the data
3) also, something that shows us what the expected growth for each school is. I know that Orenco, with Quatama coming in, is coming down to about 60%. They are extremely crowded now but they are going to come down significantly. I know there is going to be growth in that area but what number is the committee looking at to understand that and make sure that the boundaries are optimal for the growth and that we’re not counting on more growth than will occur, especially given the current economic situation?
We just want to make sure that the bond money being spent benefits all schools, not just a few neighborhoods.
Finally, to families that are being added to Indian Hills, we know that there are some that will be added, sorry if we are not your first choice for your children, we understand the desire to stay in the school you are currently in - that is perfectly understandable: We will welcome you with open arms…if there is enough room to actually open our arms.
I heard someone ask Mr. Pérez “If you’re moving us to Indian Hills what will you do to make sure that it stays a high quality school?” I’m sure Mr. Pérez will answer the same [way] he does for any school in the district, we will get a building with facilities, transportation, high quality administrative staff, 1 great teacher for every 26 students. That’s what the taxpayers allow him to give us.
My question back to parents coming into Indian Hills is “If you are coming to our school, what will YOU do to make sure that Indian Hills STAYS an exceptional school?”
And for anyone that is wondering, yes, I will be going to the spanish language meeting at Century.
Wednesday, December 12, 2007
Community Meeting #4
December 13, 2007
(Thursday, 7:00 – 8:30 p.m.)
RA Brown Middle School (map)
1505 SW Cornelius Pass Road
Hillsboro, OR 97123-6727
For more info on the process, go here (link).
Latest numbers show Indian Hills just short of 100% occupancy which could threaten the ability of small groups to meet, affect teacher staff room and computer room. Please come and comment if this concerns you.
December 13, 2007
(Thursday, 7:00 – 8:30 p.m.)
RA Brown Middle School (map)
1505 SW Cornelius Pass Road
Hillsboro, OR 97123-6727
For more info on the process, go here (link).
Latest numbers show Indian Hills just short of 100% occupancy which could threaten the ability of small groups to meet, affect teacher staff room and computer room. Please come and comment if this concerns you.
Here is the latest from the District presentation. For some reason, instead of just adding 66 students from Ladd Acres, the total add is 77 from the original Plan #3 numbers.
Not sure where the extra 11 kids came from but it makes the numbers much worse unless they were added to compensate for Copperleaf. I also added Orenco as a Brown feeder, the area where most growth is predicted.
Monday, December 10, 2007
Community Meeting #3: Temperatures Rising
Strong turnout from Brookwood and Eastwood parents (and lots of teachers!) at tonights meeting, otherwise a repeat performance from previous meetings. Number of parents from Ladd Acres speaking increased.
Deputy Superintendent Pérez mentioned that he has been getting a lot of heated email and that he wanted to keep the emotion out of the discussion as much as possible. He even apologized later when he contradicted a parent's statement.
Confirmed that Plan #3 adjusted number for Indian Hills shown below is correct to within a couple students, briefly spoke with a committee member about the concern with overcrowding at IH and was told that would be a topic at the next working meeting but it is clear that the primary focus will be Eastwood/Brookwood.
Will be checking the district website for updated slides that show all new school numbers.
Deputy Superintendent Pérez mentioned that he has been getting a lot of heated email and that he wanted to keep the emotion out of the discussion as much as possible. He even apologized later when he contradicted a parent's statement.
Confirmed that Plan #3 adjusted number for Indian Hills shown below is correct to within a couple students, briefly spoke with a committee member about the concern with overcrowding at IH and was told that would be a topic at the next working meeting but it is clear that the primary focus will be Eastwood/Brookwood.
Will be checking the district website for updated slides that show all new school numbers.
Sunday, December 9, 2007
Estimate of District Numbers
While Plan #3 Adjusted puts a lot of students in Indian Hills, I can see why the District is considering and why they would think it puts us more in line with other schools in the Brown feeder area. School capacity is unverified and will be updated by the district later.
IH adds are slightly different from previous calcs since some of the numbers given don't exactly match, below is based on Plan #3 presentation, not statements at working meeting which put the Ladd Acres add at 66 and east of 198th at 46.
IH adds are slightly different from previous calcs since some of the numbers given don't exactly match, below is based on Plan #3 presentation, not statements at working meeting which put the Ladd Acres add at 66 and east of 198th at 46.
Friday, December 7, 2007
Community Meeting #3 - Monday
Community Meeting #3
December 10, 2007
(Monday, 7:00 – 8:30 p.m.)
Poynter Middle School (map)
1535 NE Grant Street
Hillsboro, OR 97124-3421
For more info on the process, go here (link).
Indian Hills has a big impact of 66 students added for a total of 112 additional enrollment [ed - grades 1-6 only] from current boundary levels. Please plan on participating in this meeting.
[ed - bumped to top]
December 10, 2007
(Monday, 7:00 – 8:30 p.m.)
Poynter Middle School (map)
1535 NE Grant Street
Hillsboro, OR 97124-3421
For more info on the process, go here (link).
Indian Hills has a big impact of 66 students added for a total of 112 additional enrollment [ed - grades 1-6 only] from current boundary levels. Please plan on participating in this meeting.
[ed - bumped to top]
Wednesday, December 5, 2007
Plan #3 Adjusted: Number Crunching
Tuesday, December 4, 2007
Copperleaf Subdivision Near Brown
I stopped into the sales office of Riverside Homes in the subdivision being built across from Brown MS, currently in the IH boundary.
Summary
Planned size of the subdivision: 75 homes over 2 years,
Sold so far: 17 homes since April (recently had first move-in)
Occupancy by fall '08: ~35 homes
Occupancy by fall '09: 75 homes
She said that sales have been strong because they are on the higher end of the market and are seeing a lot of folks interested in upgrading from within the IH boundary because they don't want to change schools and there is very little high end housing in the neighborhood.
She expressed a preference to remain in the IH boundary since the school is very close and has been a selling point.
Update
Based on the PSU enrollment forecast study on the HSD website (here), table 8 shows that for new large lot (>3250 sq ft lot size) detached single family homes built recently (data based on 2003 build date) Student Generation Rate (SGR) for K-6 is 0.362.
The home count multiplied by SGR (75 x 0.362) shows the subdivision would likely add 26 students to IH boundary upon full occupancy, one full class added by 2009 school year.
Currently, plan #5 proposes to add 112 students to IH (not counting Kinders). Based on a class size of 26, that is an addition of 4.3 classes to IH fall 2008. Add in the expected 35 homes of this subdivision, it would be 4.8 classes.
With plan #5 add combined with subdivision growth, IH would be pushed to well over 5 total classes added by start of school 2009. Add in uncounted Kinders from plan #5 add and it is higher.
Summary
Planned size of the subdivision: 75 homes over 2 years,
Sold so far: 17 homes since April (recently had first move-in)
Occupancy by fall '08: ~35 homes
Occupancy by fall '09: 75 homes
She said that sales have been strong because they are on the higher end of the market and are seeing a lot of folks interested in upgrading from within the IH boundary because they don't want to change schools and there is very little high end housing in the neighborhood.
She expressed a preference to remain in the IH boundary since the school is very close and has been a selling point.
Update
Based on the PSU enrollment forecast study on the HSD website (here), table 8 shows that for new large lot (>3250 sq ft lot size) detached single family homes built recently (data based on 2003 build date) Student Generation Rate (SGR) for K-6 is 0.362.
The home count multiplied by SGR (75 x 0.362) shows the subdivision would likely add 26 students to IH boundary upon full occupancy, one full class added by 2009 school year.
Currently, plan #5 proposes to add 112 students to IH (not counting Kinders). Based on a class size of 26, that is an addition of 4.3 classes to IH fall 2008. Add in the expected 35 homes of this subdivision, it would be 4.8 classes.
With plan #5 add combined with subdivision growth, IH would be pushed to well over 5 total classes added by start of school 2009. Add in uncounted Kinders from plan #5 add and it is higher.
Monday, December 3, 2007
Working Session #4 - Indian Hills Big Add
Quick update before I eat dinner:
The only key decision made in today's working session was to add Ladd Acres students back into Indian Hills and this will be presented as Plan #5 next Monday and Thursday at Community Meetings. This adds 66 students to 46 added east of 198th (2 more kids being added south of Johnson) for a total add to current enrollment of 112 students.
There are no work sessions planned prior to those meetings so there are unlikely to be any changes made unless it happens behind the curtain.
I will add to this post as I can, email went out to PTO mail list to share the update. I encourage those who are best in touch with the impact of adding 27% to current enrollment to put together a statement for the next meeting in one week, Monday night at Poynter.
Bad News: No resolution on Eastwood/Brookwood. The committee seems resigned to Plan #3 boundaries for the schools after devoting most of 2 working sessions to the problem. They briefly considered sending Brookwood to Brown/Century but nothing was established and no changes going into the next Community meetings for the 2 school boundaries from Plan #3.
The only key decision made in today's working session was to add Ladd Acres students back into Indian Hills and this will be presented as Plan #5 next Monday and Thursday at Community Meetings. This adds 66 students to 46 added east of 198th (2 more kids being added south of Johnson) for a total add to current enrollment of 112 students.
There are no work sessions planned prior to those meetings so there are unlikely to be any changes made unless it happens behind the curtain.
I will add to this post as I can, email went out to PTO mail list to share the update. I encourage those who are best in touch with the impact of adding 27% to current enrollment to put together a statement for the next meeting in one week, Monday night at Poynter.
Bad News: No resolution on Eastwood/Brookwood. The committee seems resigned to Plan #3 boundaries for the schools after devoting most of 2 working sessions to the problem. They briefly considered sending Brookwood to Brown/Century but nothing was established and no changes going into the next Community meetings for the 2 school boundaries from Plan #3.
Meeting Notice - Monday Work Session
Boundary Committee Work Session #4
December 3, 2007
(Monday, 4:30 – 6:30 p.m.)
Board Room
Hillsboro School Administration Center (map)
3083 NE 49th Place
Hillsboro, OR 97124-6009
Phone: 503-844-1500
For more info on the process, go here (link).
"...the public is invited to attend the boundary committee work sessions, provide brief comment during the citizens’ participation portion, and listen to the committee’s discussions."
December 3, 2007
(Monday, 4:30 – 6:30 p.m.)
Board Room
Hillsboro School Administration Center (map)
3083 NE 49th Place
Hillsboro, OR 97124-6009
Phone: 503-844-1500
For more info on the process, go here (link).
"...the public is invited to attend the boundary committee work sessions, provide brief comment during the citizens’ participation portion, and listen to the committee’s discussions."
Compare and Contrast: Beaverton and Hillsboro
Beaverton is currently going through a somewhat reduced boundary adjustment process north of Sunset Hwy. I did some reading through the BSD website and it was interesting to see the differences.
Communication from Hillsboro is great, we got off to a slow start but the district website is very up to date and it is easy to find relevant info. The Beaverton site is a little harder to find, less crisp.
Another interesting difference is the tone, Hillsboro has been extremely open while Beaverton's process seems a little more closed.
The Oregonian has more:
Not Just School Boundaries At Issue For Board
The tone with parents is slightly combative as can be seen in this exchange with a parent group apparently with Superintendent for Beaverton Schools Jerome Colonna:
Communication from Hillsboro is great, we got off to a slow start but the district website is very up to date and it is easy to find relevant info. The Beaverton site is a little harder to find, less crisp.
Another interesting difference is the tone, Hillsboro has been extremely open while Beaverton's process seems a little more closed.
The Oregonian has more:
Not Just School Boundaries At Issue For Board
The tone with parents is slightly combative as can be seen in this exchange with a parent group apparently with Superintendent for Beaverton Schools Jerome Colonna:
Emerald Estates - appears to have changed the destiny of a larger group of approximately 250 students, 30% of the total amount of displaced students. If you don’t keep in mind capacity and safety in a well established neighborhood, staying on Wismer Dr., if my child does not attend Wismer Elementary it is an irony. Is it the "pizza slice" that creates this change? It appears a small group of students tips the balance one way or the other.A little testy perhaps, but it gets a little more pointed from parents in a following exchange:
Response: I am aware of the feeling among the community that those who speak the loudest and the most about a particular topic have the greatest opportunity to make changes. The squeaky wheel gets the grease so to speak. If you simply ask long enough or hard enough with enough people, you will be successful is swaying the final decision. It is understandable. What is swaying the District to change are better ideas. Change will not be made based on the number of people who speak about a particular topic.
Terra Linda – As a teacher and parent I have worked hard to fund the schools. This last bond was passed for capacity reasons. Now Findley will be over 100% capacity, Terra Linda reduced to 80% and the Beaverton School District is not doing what it said it would do with the bond dollars. Why did we pass a bond to work on capacity and even out the schools, making it so Findley could have Kindergarten on site which is not considered in this proposal? Have you looked to the future? You discuss buildings and buying land, but where is that money going to come from? My concern is all the people who voted to have their taxes raised in order to alleviate over crowding. They are not going to vote for a bond when the Beaverton School District has not done what it says it’s going to do.
Response: I have received several email messages that indicate if we change the boundary the person would lose faith in the Beaverton School District. They didn’t feel they could support a future bond. I am sorry people feel that way. My colleagues and I are trying to do the very best that we can for the overall District four years out...A bond measure is not for an individual son or daughter, one classroom or one school. It is for public education across the entire District. We live in a State that does not fund growth for schools and that puts the burden on community members. If in the best of our ability to try to make the best decisions we can causes the community see the District as not following through with what we said we would do with the bond and loses faith, I am really very sorry about that...If it doesn’t go quite your way, I hope with time, in your heart, you would be able to find for the greater good, to vote against future bond measures against thousands of people’s children in a State that does not fund growth is a fairly extreme measure and I hope that we can regain your faith.
I think that the argument that voting against future bonds just hurts kids is a weak one and that a district must be committed to working with the community for the best solution now, for the parents who fought to get a bond passed and expect to see their children benefit. Everyone won't be happy but the more open the process, the easier for parents to deal with the result.
Given the turmoil in Beaverton, I also think that the Hillsboro School Board decision to place the boundary process in the hands of competent administrators was the right move to make.
I hope the Hillsboro School District and District parents keep on the same path we have been on with open dialog and constructive input to the process. As the process gets closer to an end, we need to make sure the communication stays positive and everyone is working for an optimum solution.
Friday, November 30, 2007
Argus Article from HSD - Jane Siguenza
Inside schools boundary information
11/27/2007, Special to The Argus - Nearly one hundred community members attended the first community meeting on Nov. 19 on the Hillsboro School District's attendance boundary adjustments. The meeting, which was held at Evergreen Middle School, focused on the cu...
It is good to see the district pushing info into the media. As we were leaving JB Thomas last night I told Nicole Kaufman (HSD Exec. Dir. of Community Relations) that the communication from the district has improved dramatically in just a week-and-a-half, the main boundary web page is getting regular updates, almost blog-like in regularity and chronological ordering.
11/27/2007, Special to The Argus - Nearly one hundred community members attended the first community meeting on Nov. 19 on the Hillsboro School District's attendance boundary adjustments. The meeting, which was held at Evergreen Middle School, focused on the cu...
It is good to see the district pushing info into the media. As we were leaving JB Thomas last night I told Nicole Kaufman (HSD Exec. Dir. of Community Relations) that the communication from the district has improved dramatically in just a week-and-a-half, the main boundary web page is getting regular updates, almost blog-like in regularity and chronological ordering.
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Indian Hills Neighbor: Can you fit 2 more?
One of the parents at tonight's meeting mentioned that most of the kids in her neighborhood are being moved from Reedville to Indian Hills, the boundary is at Johnson, just north of her cul de sac.
Her 2 kids would have to wait for the bus alone or walk more than 2 blocks to join other kids. If they go to Indian Hills, they will be able to take the bus with the same group of kids that they ride with to Reedville now.
Here is her cul de sac:
This should be a no-brainer. Robin asked for specifics on the street name after hearing the comment and in my experience the committee typically will accommodate, even if it is just a couple kids. [edit - for clarity]
My opinion? Welcome to Indian Hills!
Her 2 kids would have to wait for the bus alone or walk more than 2 blocks to join other kids. If they go to Indian Hills, they will be able to take the bus with the same group of kids that they ride with to Reedville now.
Here is her cul de sac:
This should be a no-brainer. Robin asked for specifics on the street name after hearing the comment and in my experience the committee typically will accommodate, even if it is just a couple kids. [edit - for clarity]
My opinion? Welcome to Indian Hills!
Public Meeting #2: Visible Progress
IHBoundary Comments:
No changes announced for any boundary from Plan #3.
From the start of today's meeting it was clear that the process is running much smoother on the committee side and that parents are getting more engaged. Both are good for the district. About 100 were in attendance per my 4th grader's count.
Robin's presentation was very much improved since public meeting #1, no doubt it required a lot of work to prepare but it was worth it - crisp clear pages with a laser pointer to guide the attendees through the plan. It amazes me how many of the details are in her head, she must dream of every little cul de sac and development in the district at night.
Indian Hills Team Spirit
There was at least one parent from Indian Hills who spoke up and urged the committee to leave Indian Hills unchanged, he has 5 kids in the boundary. He thanked the committee for their hard work. One parent who is currently in Reedville commented that all of the kids in her neighborhood will be at Indian Hills and requested their small cul de sac with 2 kids be moved with the bulk of the neighborhood to IH. More detail on that later.
Intro by Deputy Superintendent Pérez
Nice smooth intro, he hit all of the major themes that are hot buttons for parents and the real driving factors in the boundary change process. He did well later in the session when parents directly addressed questions to him, very straightforward and clear answers. Map presentation was much clearer as mentioned.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Jackson
Parents For Jackson, apparently in unity with folks from the area south of Evergreen between 15th and Jackson School - they were nicely organized and had a clear message. They have hit the streets in the neighborhood with 200 fliers with many opposing the plan #3 boundary. They asked the committee to consider the need for a rich social environment, strong ties with the neighborhoods, sports, playgroups, etc. Friends will be much further away, geographically grouped areas are important for social interaction. The parents preferred Plan 1/2 which moved apartments out of Jackson. I think they went off course when they stated that it would be easier for apartments to move than home owners, and that they are more supportive of school activities. They ended up sounding like "let's move the poor people". A later commenter noted that kids in apartments already have enough instability, school can be the one stable element in their life.
Another parent from Jackson later commented on the need for kids to be able to walk to a neighborhood school, some parents don't have good transportation options, it also improves after-school activities. She noted that they had picked their home partially based on being inside the Jackson boundary and would appreciate at very least some sort of "grandfather" policy to allow kids to finish with the school they started with.
Ladd Acres to Tobias
One parent (a constant attender at almost all meetings to-date) noted that the designation of the section moving out of Ladd Acres as "portable" should apply to all neighborhoods on buses, not just the Ladd Acres families. Another parent from the area noted that Tobias state test scores are much lower than other schools in the area and that bullying is an issue for kids waiting for daycare buses at Tobias. She also noted that there is no way for kids to safely cross Corn Pass if walking.
Hilhi to Liberty, drop in Hilhi enrollment concerns
One parent from Brookwood noted that youth programs at elementary levels lead to participation in HS programs, they create relationships with adults that impact them positively and follow them as they move into HS.Liberty Hillsboro
Another parent was concerned about the impact to Hilhi; he had seen big shifts when Century andLiberty opened
Another Brookwood/Hilhi parent had questions for DS Pérez:
When you reduce numbers in a school, what effect does it have on a school?
CP – Anytime you drop a school enrollment it impacts number of teachers based on teacher/student ratio requirements as well as funds, budgetary impact to school.
Is there a timeline to make up the drop in attendance at Hilhi?
CP – there are a number of areas that will be growing, Witchhazel has grown, plus areas in South Hillsboro reserve that will be coming in with Metro boundary change pending. Continued infill expected where parcel goes from 1 home to 6 homes, higher density phenomenon. The district averages .5 kids for every residence.
Parent concluded with comments about Hilhi, noting as another parent did that since Century was added they have battled getting parental support, improving test scores, etc. Encourages committee to consider impact to neighborhoods and keep them intact. A kid at Hilhi should have the same opportunity as kids at any other HS. Parents that have to drive a long distance don’t engage as much in school activities.
A parent from Bald Peak explored the impact of factors like SES and student language on decision process, directed to DS Pérez, concerned about impact on Hilhi.
CP - language or ethnicity not a factor, for example ELL (English Language Learner) is a constantly moving number, not easy to measure and thus not very useful in a boundary decision and has been a very limited consideration in the current process. SES is easily determined by applications for free/reduced lunch. The district is not going to 'gerrymander' areas to balance SES, only will look at contiguous areas or those in close proximity to a boundary line. SES is definitely part of the equation, one school may be at 70% and another at 30%, if that can be mitigated, they will try to reduce, not looking for a particular goal number. Eastwood is an example, plan #3 increases SES % significantly and that is a factor.
David Hill/Boscow Barnes
Finally, one parent inquired about SES (lunch assistance) ratios for Boscow Barnes and she believes it is very high. She noted that there are big differences in schools just in fund raising: David Hill was able to raise only $7k recently while a neighboring school raised ~$40k in comparison. [ed. - I think IH was at about $10k per the same metric] She also made a passionate statement about how kids in apartments need stability as noted above, very articulate and moving.
Final IHBN Thought:
I'm worried about David Hill and Boscow Barnes families. They already feel excluded because their school identity is being destroyed, Farmington View doesn't want the David Hill kids and they are being treated like the proverbial red-headed stepchild. Schools in the district should be welcoming these families - community extends beyond school boundary lines.
Note: These notes are based on my own observations, I will review the official minutes when they are published and make any needed corrections. It isn't always easy to hear every word of every comment. If you have any corrections, please let me know and I will correct any factual errors immediately.
No changes announced for any boundary from Plan #3.
From the start of today's meeting it was clear that the process is running much smoother on the committee side and that parents are getting more engaged. Both are good for the district. About 100 were in attendance per my 4th grader's count.
Robin's presentation was very much improved since public meeting #1, no doubt it required a lot of work to prepare but it was worth it - crisp clear pages with a laser pointer to guide the attendees through the plan. It amazes me how many of the details are in her head, she must dream of every little cul de sac and development in the district at night.
Indian Hills Team Spirit
There was at least one parent from Indian Hills who spoke up and urged the committee to leave Indian Hills unchanged, he has 5 kids in the boundary. He thanked the committee for their hard work. One parent who is currently in Reedville commented that all of the kids in her neighborhood will be at Indian Hills and requested their small cul de sac with 2 kids be moved with the bulk of the neighborhood to IH. More detail on that later.
Intro by Deputy Superintendent Pérez
Nice smooth intro, he hit all of the major themes that are hot buttons for parents and the real driving factors in the boundary change process. He did well later in the session when parents directly addressed questions to him, very straightforward and clear answers. Map presentation was much clearer as mentioned.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Jackson
Parents For Jackson, apparently in unity with folks from the area south of Evergreen between 15th and Jackson School - they were nicely organized and had a clear message. They have hit the streets in the neighborhood with 200 fliers with many opposing the plan #3 boundary. They asked the committee to consider the need for a rich social environment, strong ties with the neighborhoods, sports, playgroups, etc. Friends will be much further away, geographically grouped areas are important for social interaction. The parents preferred Plan 1/2 which moved apartments out of Jackson. I think they went off course when they stated that it would be easier for apartments to move than home owners, and that they are more supportive of school activities. They ended up sounding like "let's move the poor people". A later commenter noted that kids in apartments already have enough instability, school can be the one stable element in their life.
Another parent from Jackson later commented on the need for kids to be able to walk to a neighborhood school, some parents don't have good transportation options, it also improves after-school activities. She noted that they had picked their home partially based on being inside the Jackson boundary and would appreciate at very least some sort of "grandfather" policy to allow kids to finish with the school they started with.
Ladd Acres to Tobias
One parent (a constant attender at almost all meetings to-date) noted that the designation of the section moving out of Ladd Acres as "portable" should apply to all neighborhoods on buses, not just the Ladd Acres families. Another parent from the area noted that Tobias state test scores are much lower than other schools in the area and that bullying is an issue for kids waiting for daycare buses at Tobias. She also noted that there is no way for kids to safely cross Corn Pass if walking.
Hilhi to Liberty, drop in Hilhi enrollment concerns
One parent from Brookwood noted that youth programs at elementary levels lead to participation in HS programs, they create relationships with adults that impact them positively and follow them as they move into HS.
Another parent was concerned about the impact to Hilhi; he had seen big shifts when Century and
Another Brookwood/Hilhi parent had questions for DS Pérez:
When you reduce numbers in a school, what effect does it have on a school?
CP – Anytime you drop a school enrollment it impacts number of teachers based on teacher/student ratio requirements as well as funds, budgetary impact to school.
Is there a timeline to make up the drop in attendance at Hilhi?
CP – there are a number of areas that will be growing, Witchhazel has grown, plus areas in South Hillsboro reserve that will be coming in with Metro boundary change pending. Continued infill expected where parcel goes from 1 home to 6 homes, higher density phenomenon. The district averages .5 kids for every residence.
Parent concluded with comments about Hilhi, noting as another parent did that since Century was added they have battled getting parental support, improving test scores, etc. Encourages committee to consider impact to neighborhoods and keep them intact. A kid at Hilhi should have the same opportunity as kids at any other HS. Parents that have to drive a long distance don’t engage as much in school activities.
A parent from Bald Peak explored the impact of factors like SES and student language on decision process, directed to DS Pérez, concerned about impact on Hilhi.
CP - language or ethnicity not a factor, for example ELL (English Language Learner) is a constantly moving number, not easy to measure and thus not very useful in a boundary decision and has been a very limited consideration in the current process. SES is easily determined by applications for free/reduced lunch. The district is not going to 'gerrymander' areas to balance SES, only will look at contiguous areas or those in close proximity to a boundary line. SES is definitely part of the equation, one school may be at 70% and another at 30%, if that can be mitigated, they will try to reduce, not looking for a particular goal number. Eastwood is an example, plan #3 increases SES % significantly and that is a factor.
David Hill/Boscow Barnes
Finally, one parent inquired about SES (lunch assistance) ratios for Boscow Barnes and she believes it is very high. She noted that there are big differences in schools just in fund raising: David Hill was able to raise only $7k recently while a neighboring school raised ~$40k in comparison. [ed. - I think IH was at about $10k per the same metric] She also made a passionate statement about how kids in apartments need stability as noted above, very articulate and moving.
Final IHBN Thought:
I'm worried about David Hill and Boscow Barnes families. They already feel excluded because their school identity is being destroyed, Farmington View doesn't want the David Hill kids and they are being treated like the proverbial red-headed stepchild. Schools in the district should be welcoming these families - community extends beyond school boundary lines.
Note: These notes are based on my own observations, I will review the official minutes when they are published and make any needed corrections. It isn't always easy to hear every word of every comment. If you have any corrections, please let me know and I will correct any factual errors immediately.
Monday, November 26, 2007
Meeting Notice - This Thursday
Community Meeting #2
November 29, 2007
(Thursday, 7:00 – 8:30 p.m.)
Thomas Middle School Auditorium (map)
645 NE Lincoln Street
Hillsboro, OR 97124-3236
For more info on the process, go here (link).
Committee representatives will be presenting plan #3, same as what was presented at Evergreen (but after last week we know they like to surprise us). They stated they will be addressing concerns about Eastwood and Brookwood specifically but did not plan to present any new maps.
This is a conflict with PTO, I would encourage anyone on the fence to attend the PTO, I don't believe there will be any real revelations at this meeting. I will be attending since the blog demands to be fed.
November 29, 2007
(Thursday, 7:00 – 8:30 p.m.)
Thomas Middle School Auditorium (map)
645 NE Lincoln Street
Hillsboro, OR 97124-3236
For more info on the process, go here (link).
Committee representatives will be presenting plan #3, same as what was presented at Evergreen (but after last week we know they like to surprise us). They stated they will be addressing concerns about Eastwood and Brookwood specifically but did not plan to present any new maps.
This is a conflict with PTO, I would encourage anyone on the fence to attend the PTO, I don't believe there will be any real revelations at this meeting. I will be attending since the blog demands to be fed.
Working Meeting #3: A Process, Not An Event
Indian Hills Team Spirit
We had our Energizer Bunny™ PTO officer on hand along with a couple parents (myself included) and a school staff member who came to hear about Indian Hills and discovered that her high schooler may be affected by the change. Note: no changes considered for IH boundary at this meeting.
Intro by Deputy Superintendent Pérez
Carlos addressed parents prior to public comments and let them know that the main focus for the meeting would be addressing concerns from Eastwood and Brookwood parents that came out in Public Meeting #1.
He stated that, while work was going to be done tonight (eventually designated plan #4), Plan #3 would be presented at Thomas on Thursday, the same plan that was shown at Evergreen. He said they would attempt to address the Eastwood and Brookwood concerns at the meeting but would not be showing modified maps. The meeting will be in Thomas auditorium, not the library, based on the Evergreen meeting which was quite crowded.
Public Comments
- A parent from Butternut Creek expressed a desire to change from SouthMeadows/HilHi to Brown/Century since it didn't seem to make sense to drive by Century on the way to take his kids to school and that it seemed like it isolated them from friends in the Reedville area. I see his point, I thought there might be an easier way to get to Hilhi from that neighborhood but TV Hwy is really the most direct route.
- A parent from Eastwood brought up that the part of the Eastwood boundary being removed included many of the most active parents in the school. She also expressed concern that the school was already challenged from a socioeconomic point of view and the plan #3 boundary would only make it worse.
Committee Feedback from Public Meeting #1
Aside from noting the need to move from the library to the auditorium, the committee noted that larger school names on the maps would help and that if there was a 2nd set of maps in the hallway, that may facilitate discussion before and after the meeting. It was also noted that Robin should have her own computer. Carlos said that they would have a computer that he and Robin would share for the presentation and that they would not rely on the VersaTrans school transportation GIS system for presenting but would use slides instead to make the process smoother.
Eastwood and Brookwood
The core meeting started with a close look at the boundary for both schools. Robin noted that planning for this area is very hard because they will take out a single home and turn it into a development with 10 homes. They are considering pulling much of the Eastwood boundary back to original boundary with the exception of areas south of baseline for plan #4. This started a more general discussion of impact on feeders and the balloons began drifting around the room. While the balloons drifted, it was clear that the committee was much more focused than in the last meeting and you could track the process much more clearly.
It was noted several times that, while VersaTrans may spit out an enrollment number, actual enrollment may differ significantly due to transfers and home schooling.
Orenco and Butternut Creek
Because of the need to adjust in other areas, there was some discussion about pulling Orenco out of Brown/Century into Poynter/Liberty and moving Butternut Creek from SouthMeadows/Hilhi to Brown/Century. There was even a single voice briefly asking if Willow Creek should come out of Tobias again (gasp).
Rural vs City and Neighborhood Schools
Carlos briefly spoke up with pointed comments about the difference between a rural lifestyle and city, when parents choose to live in a rural area, they expect to have to travel significant distances for most things, even for school, but sending city kids to a rural school is a major change, parents may not have the necessary options for transportation to a rural school.
He stated that a specific goal was to keep elementary schools as neighborhood schools. Mid and High school families should expect to go further, you can’t always make a school a neighborhood school.
He mentioned that Farmington View parents had made comments about hiring a dedicated math teacher with their own money, and that they don’t want a lot of kids from town brought into the school to the point where it dilutes the efforts they have put in, he offered that maybe they should look at option of some magnets to bring in kids that would benefit the most without overwhelming the current parents efforts.
The principal of David Hill noted that people walk to David Hill because they can, not because they don’t have any other options. That needs to be considered also.
IHBoundary Thoughts
As I have said at least once before, this is a process, not an event. When a major change is required in a single elementary boundary it quickly ricochets around the district and impacts 8 more schools. The committee seemed much more focused in this session and there was less pushing and pulling of Robin as they considered the impact of a smaller set of changes. I was encouraged by the tighter focus and what seemed to be real progress. It also occurred to me that it is critical to stay engaged, nothing is off the table at this point.
Mantra: Process, Not, Event.
We had our Energizer Bunny™ PTO officer on hand along with a couple parents (myself included) and a school staff member who came to hear about Indian Hills and discovered that her high schooler may be affected by the change. Note: no changes considered for IH boundary at this meeting.
Intro by Deputy Superintendent Pérez
Carlos addressed parents prior to public comments and let them know that the main focus for the meeting would be addressing concerns from Eastwood and Brookwood parents that came out in Public Meeting #1.
He stated that, while work was going to be done tonight (eventually designated plan #4), Plan #3 would be presented at Thomas on Thursday, the same plan that was shown at Evergreen. He said they would attempt to address the Eastwood and Brookwood concerns at the meeting but would not be showing modified maps. The meeting will be in Thomas auditorium, not the library, based on the Evergreen meeting which was quite crowded.
Public Comments
- A parent from Butternut Creek expressed a desire to change from SouthMeadows/HilHi to Brown/Century since it didn't seem to make sense to drive by Century on the way to take his kids to school and that it seemed like it isolated them from friends in the Reedville area. I see his point, I thought there might be an easier way to get to Hilhi from that neighborhood but TV Hwy is really the most direct route.
- A parent from Eastwood brought up that the part of the Eastwood boundary being removed included many of the most active parents in the school. She also expressed concern that the school was already challenged from a socioeconomic point of view and the plan #3 boundary would only make it worse.
Committee Feedback from Public Meeting #1
Aside from noting the need to move from the library to the auditorium, the committee noted that larger school names on the maps would help and that if there was a 2nd set of maps in the hallway, that may facilitate discussion before and after the meeting. It was also noted that Robin should have her own computer. Carlos said that they would have a computer that he and Robin would share for the presentation and that they would not rely on the VersaTrans school transportation GIS system for presenting but would use slides instead to make the process smoother.
Eastwood and Brookwood
The core meeting started with a close look at the boundary for both schools. Robin noted that planning for this area is very hard because they will take out a single home and turn it into a development with 10 homes. They are considering pulling much of the Eastwood boundary back to original boundary with the exception of areas south of baseline for plan #4. This started a more general discussion of impact on feeders and the balloons began drifting around the room. While the balloons drifted, it was clear that the committee was much more focused than in the last meeting and you could track the process much more clearly.
It was noted several times that, while VersaTrans may spit out an enrollment number, actual enrollment may differ significantly due to transfers and home schooling.
Orenco and Butternut Creek
Because of the need to adjust in other areas, there was some discussion about pulling Orenco out of Brown/Century into Poynter/Liberty and moving Butternut Creek from SouthMeadows/Hilhi to Brown/Century. There was even a single voice briefly asking if Willow Creek should come out of Tobias again (gasp).
Rural vs City and Neighborhood Schools
Carlos briefly spoke up with pointed comments about the difference between a rural lifestyle and city, when parents choose to live in a rural area, they expect to have to travel significant distances for most things, even for school, but sending city kids to a rural school is a major change, parents may not have the necessary options for transportation to a rural school.
He stated that a specific goal was to keep elementary schools as neighborhood schools. Mid and High school families should expect to go further, you can’t always make a school a neighborhood school.
He mentioned that Farmington View parents had made comments about hiring a dedicated math teacher with their own money, and that they don’t want a lot of kids from town brought into the school to the point where it dilutes the efforts they have put in, he offered that maybe they should look at option of some magnets to bring in kids that would benefit the most without overwhelming the current parents efforts.
The principal of David Hill noted that people walk to David Hill because they can, not because they don’t have any other options. That needs to be considered also.
IHBoundary Thoughts
As I have said at least once before, this is a process, not an event. When a major change is required in a single elementary boundary it quickly ricochets around the district and impacts 8 more schools. The committee seemed much more focused in this session and there was less pushing and pulling of Robin as they considered the impact of a smaller set of changes. I was encouraged by the tighter focus and what seemed to be real progress. It also occurred to me that it is critical to stay engaged, nothing is off the table at this point.
Mantra: Process, Not, Event.
Next Community Meeting –
Where Were You in '82? Yearbook Fun
Glencoe computer club (not the Unabomber despite the resemblance; that guy hated technology and had a hoodie, not a bowl cut '80s shag). Click the image for huge bitmap goodness but be prepared, it is not pretty... Somehow I ended up as an engineer for a large local computer company. Go figure. (Thanks Mr. Brandl!!)
"...the Evergreen 8th grade girls basketball team left everyone smiling...The green team had a record of 10 wins and 0 losses...#22 voted Best Defensive Player"Hmmm, where could she possibly find a sports friendly job in the Hillsboro/Beaverton area?
Hair seems to be a theme here.
This Evergreen counselor seems vaguely familiar. He looks like a problem solver; full of energy and ready to change things for the better.Well, maybe after 25 years he has a cushy low effort district job where he doesn't have to deal with stressful change, over-involved parents, torches, pitchforks, etc.
Please, no hair comments. Seriously. Just don't.
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Hillsboro School District Statement on Community Meeting
Hillsboro School District Holds First Community Meeting on Boundary Adjustments.
The Boundary Committee presented its Plan 3 proposal on Nov. 19 to community members packed in the Evergreen Middle School library. Large boundary maps were posted along the library shelves for viewing.
Deputy Superintendent Carlos Perez provided background information on the process and rationale behind the boundary adjustments. Robin Biden, Director of Transportation Services, explained where planned boundaries changed from existing lines and the preliminary Plan 1 proposal, and how enrollment numbers at each school were affected.
Together, Perez and Biden answered many questions from the audience. In general, questions centered around distance or transportation issues, breaking up close communities, and school feeder and enrollment changes. Perez noted that everyone's comments, oral and written, are considered by the Committee.
He also cautioned that the boundary plan is a work-in-progress that can shift as comments and district criteria are evaluated throughout the process. It is not final until the Board reviews the Committee's recommendation in January 2008 and formalizes its decision in February 2008. Perez invited everyone to attend as many community and work meetings as they wish to keep up to speed and comment on changes. This web site also will continue to post changes as soon as they are made available.
For complete information, visit: http://www.hsd.k12.or.us/district/construction/boundary_adjustments.asp
Argus Covers Public Meeting #1
Hundreds jam library for school boundary meeting
11/21/2007, The Argus - The first community meeting Nov. 19 at Evergreen Middle School about proposed Hillsboro School District boundary changes was standing room only. After the 7 p.m. start of the third discussion (the first two were work sessions) of distric...
CORRECTION: The Argus article got the date for the next community meeting wrong, it should read: "Community meetings are scheduled for 7 to 8:30 p.m.Monday, Nov. 26 Thursday Nov. 29 in the J.B. Thomas Middle School library."
The next work session meeting is Monday, Nov. 26 (see post below this one), it is open to the public but shouldn't be confused with the community meetings communicated in the Argus.
[11/26 10:30a update - Got an email from Lisa Cromwell this morning, they have talked to the district and they will put a notice on the door of JB Thomas, apparently it was incorrect in the Oregonian as well.]
11/21/2007, The Argus - The first community meeting Nov. 19 at Evergreen Middle School about proposed Hillsboro School District boundary changes was standing room only. After the 7 p.m. start of the third discussion (the first two were work sessions) of distric...
CORRECTION: The Argus article got the date for the next community meeting wrong, it should read: "Community meetings are scheduled for 7 to 8:30 p.m.
The next work session meeting is Monday, Nov. 26 (see post below this one), it is open to the public but shouldn't be confused with the community meetings communicated in the Argus.
[11/26 10:30a update - Got an email from Lisa Cromwell this morning, they have talked to the district and they will put a notice on the door of JB Thomas, apparently it was incorrect in the Oregonian as well.]
Meeting Notice - This Monday
Boundary Committee Work Session #3
November 26, 2007
(Monday, 4:30 – 6:30 p.m.)
Board Room
Hillsboro School Administration Center (map)
3083 NE 49th Place
Hillsboro, OR 97124-6009
Phone: 503-844-1500
For more info on the process, go here (link).
"...the public is invited to attend the boundary committee work sessions, provide brief comment during the citizens’ participation portion, and listen to the committee’s discussions."
November 26, 2007
(Monday, 4:30 – 6:30 p.m.)
Board Room
Hillsboro School Administration Center (map)
3083 NE 49th Place
Hillsboro, OR 97124-6009
Phone: 503-844-1500
For more info on the process, go here (link).
"...the public is invited to attend the boundary committee work sessions, provide brief comment during the citizens’ participation portion, and listen to the committee’s discussions."
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
News Hounds
I've seen some visits from Oregonian and Argus domains, please note: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
The Core
I was initially uneasy about the boundary process (and assumed the worst) when I looked at elementary school administrators on the committee and the schools they represent. Since then, the actions of the committee turned my assumptions upside down, they clearly listened to Indian Hills parents and it wasn't about where we're from.
Right now Eastwood is taking a hit straight to the jaw on redistribution of students and their principal is on the committee; there is no magic force field granted by the position. In fact, it must be much harder to look the parents in the eye and say, "Yes, I am part of the committee and I concur with this proposed change." Who would ask to be put in that spot?
However, I have finally been able to illustrate my initial concern in the picture below. On the left is a map of all elementary schools with North Plains far to the north and Groner way down south, on the right are elementary schools with administrators on the committee.
Next time can we include at least one elementary administrator from outside Hillsboro City Limits?
Will it make a difference in the outcome? Probably not.
Will it make a difference in how folks in unincorporated Washington County or outlying communities feel about the process? You betcha.
[edit - some changes on a couple paras for clarity]
Right now Eastwood is taking a hit straight to the jaw on redistribution of students and their principal is on the committee; there is no magic force field granted by the position. In fact, it must be much harder to look the parents in the eye and say, "Yes, I am part of the committee and I concur with this proposed change." Who would ask to be put in that spot?
However, I have finally been able to illustrate my initial concern in the picture below. On the left is a map of all elementary schools with North Plains far to the north and Groner way down south, on the right are elementary schools with administrators on the committee.
Next time can we include at least one elementary administrator from outside Hillsboro City Limits?
Will it make a difference in the outcome? Probably not.
Will it make a difference in how folks in unincorporated Washington County or outlying communities feel about the process? You betcha.
[edit - some changes on a couple paras for clarity]
Meet The Committee
COMMUNITY PARTNERS
Commander Chris Skinner - Hillsboro Police Department
Teresa Gibson - City of Hillsboro Engineering Department
PARENTS
Lisa Coates - Century High School
Beverly Anderson - Evergreen Middle School
Monica Cordrey - Hillsboro High School
Steve Holser - Liberty High School
Gail Harris - McKinney Elementary & Glencoe High Schools
Theresa Kinnan -Tobias Elementary School
DISTRICT ADMINISTRATORS
Robin Biden - Director Transportation Services
Gustavo Balderas - Executive Director, School Improvement
Colin Croas - Coordinator Safety & Energy Management
SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS
Patti Wiemer - McKinney Elementary School, Principal
Janis Hill - Jackson Elementary School, Principal
Toni Crummett - David Hill Elementary School, Principal
Dave Parker - J. B. Thomas Middle School, Principal
Monique Monahan - Eastwood Elementary School, Principal
Lauri Lewis - Patterson Elementary School, Principal
Crystal Schmidt-Dipaola - Imlay Elementary School, Principal
Greg Timmons - Poynter Middle School, Principal
Ted Zehr - Century High School, Principal
Anne Erwin - Hillsboro High School, Assistant Principal
Gregg O’Mara - Liberty High School, Principal
Commander Chris Skinner - Hillsboro Police Department
Teresa Gibson - City of Hillsboro Engineering Department
PARENTS
Lisa Coates - Century High School
Beverly Anderson - Evergreen Middle School
Monica Cordrey - Hillsboro High School
Steve Holser - Liberty High School
Gail Harris - McKinney Elementary & Glencoe High Schools
Theresa Kinnan -Tobias Elementary School
DISTRICT ADMINISTRATORS
Robin Biden - Director Transportation Services
Gustavo Balderas - Executive Director, School Improvement
Colin Croas - Coordinator Safety & Energy Management
SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS
Patti Wiemer - McKinney Elementary School, Principal
Janis Hill - Jackson Elementary School, Principal
Toni Crummett - David Hill Elementary School, Principal
Dave Parker - J. B. Thomas Middle School, Principal
Monique Monahan - Eastwood Elementary School, Principal
Lauri Lewis - Patterson Elementary School, Principal
Crystal Schmidt-Dipaola - Imlay Elementary School, Principal
Greg Timmons - Poynter Middle School, Principal
Ted Zehr - Century High School, Principal
Anne Erwin - Hillsboro High School, Assistant Principal
Gregg O’Mara - Liberty High School, Principal
A Process, Not An Event
Great meeting last night with the committee providing a much improved Plan #3 that eliminates the "balloons-in-a-room" madness that was the defining feature of the "springboard" proposal for Brown MS feeder elementary schools.
THIS ISN'T DONE. I think it is unlikely that they would undo what is now a very minimum impact plan #3 for the Brown Middle School feeder. My faith in the common sense of the committee is very high. However, nothing is finalized so I will be staying in touch with the process.
We had great attendance from the PTO, Paula Jean Park and from the Shadowood area in the SE part of our boundary despite the fact that many of us knew the boundary was restored. One parent with 5 kids in IH who would have been moved to Reedville noted during public comments that we were very happy with the updated maps followed by a little light applause from the Indian Hills parents. Carlos said "OK, on that note, let's end the meeting now!"
The PTO questioned how many kids were being added on the East boundary and the answer was currently 44. Current enrollment is 383 as a snapshot today, that would bring total enrollment up to 427. Carlos stated that student teacher rations would be 26:1 for all schools even if they needed to move resources around.
Misc Notes
I met one of the parents moving out of Ladd Acres at last week's meeting, she is really nice and has been at every meeting. She spoke up last night and questioned why it was so easy to move their blocks of homes from Ladd Acres to Indian Hills to Tobias. The answer from the committee was that they are already on buses and sort of 'portable'. She is still concerned about the process but has a conflict with the next committee meeting so she asked me to let her know if anything changes.
The most upset parents in the meeting were from Eastwood and Brookwood Elementary, they are getting major changes in Plan #3 and some of the parents were very agitated. Based on my own observations of those who have influenced things, I would encourage them to get their input to the committee on paper and let common sense prevail. Stay engaged, speak to the facts.
A parent from David Hill elementary noted that her kids were not just losing an elementary but kids in her area were the only ones being asked to change all 3 schools, elementary, middle school and high school. That is one tough pill to swallow and I'm sure it weighs heavy on the committee.
Side note: Deputy Superintendent Carlos Pérez was a counselor at JB Thomas and Evergreen Jr High [edit - and Vice Principal, we got out her old yearbooks] during the time my wife attended there, she recognized him immediately. The meeting last night was in the library at Evergreen and she recalled working at the school as a summer job, scraping gum off the bottom of tables and doing landscaping. Ahhh, good times, good times.
THIS ISN'T DONE. I think it is unlikely that they would undo what is now a very minimum impact plan #3 for the Brown Middle School feeder. My faith in the common sense of the committee is very high. However, nothing is finalized so I will be staying in touch with the process.
We had great attendance from the PTO, Paula Jean Park and from the Shadowood area in the SE part of our boundary despite the fact that many of us knew the boundary was restored. One parent with 5 kids in IH who would have been moved to Reedville noted during public comments that we were very happy with the updated maps followed by a little light applause from the Indian Hills parents. Carlos said "OK, on that note, let's end the meeting now!"
The PTO questioned how many kids were being added on the East boundary and the answer was currently 44. Current enrollment is 383 as a snapshot today, that would bring total enrollment up to 427. Carlos stated that student teacher rations would be 26:1 for all schools even if they needed to move resources around.
Misc Notes
I met one of the parents moving out of Ladd Acres at last week's meeting, she is really nice and has been at every meeting. She spoke up last night and questioned why it was so easy to move their blocks of homes from Ladd Acres to Indian Hills to Tobias. The answer from the committee was that they are already on buses and sort of 'portable'. She is still concerned about the process but has a conflict with the next committee meeting so she asked me to let her know if anything changes.
The most upset parents in the meeting were from Eastwood and Brookwood Elementary, they are getting major changes in Plan #3 and some of the parents were very agitated. Based on my own observations of those who have influenced things, I would encourage them to get their input to the committee on paper and let common sense prevail. Stay engaged, speak to the facts.
A parent from David Hill elementary noted that her kids were not just losing an elementary but kids in her area were the only ones being asked to change all 3 schools, elementary, middle school and high school. That is one tough pill to swallow and I'm sure it weighs heavy on the committee.
Side note: Deputy Superintendent Carlos Pérez was a counselor at JB Thomas and Evergreen Jr High [edit - and Vice Principal, we got out her old yearbooks] during the time my wife attended there, she recognized him immediately. The meeting last night was in the library at Evergreen and she recalled working at the school as a summer job, scraping gum off the bottom of tables and doing landscaping. Ahhh, good times, good times.
Shadowood Represented
One of the parents from Shadowood in the SE portion of our boundary had a statement prepared and I wanted to capture a couple key paragraphs that express such appreciation for Indian Hills and their community identity. It would be easy to just set it aside since we are now back 'in' but I think it is important to share some parts of the comment:
[excerpt]
In 2003, my husband and I were looking to relocate. Our family was growing; we already had two boys and were in the process of adopting three more children. We needed a larger house. We lived in Beaverton at the time, but moved to the Hillsboro district in order to set down long term roots. We wanted a high quality district in which to raise our family. This year, all five of our children attend Indian Hills School. Currently, we have children in 6th, 4th, 3rd and kindergarten. We've worked with nearly every teacher in the building and have only positive experiences with the staff and principal. As you know, Indian Hills was rated "Exceptional". Of our three children who are old enough for the state benchmark testing, each have scored "Exceeds" in both math and reading. Indian Hills has been excellent for our entire family. Additionally, we have two children in IEPs and they receive their special education services at Indian Hills and two children who participate in TAG.
.....
We are part of the Shadowood Neighborhood. In Shadowood, we share a neighborhood park (across the street from our house) and a pool. The children of Shadowood enjoy the opportunity to play with one another in these settings, as well as attend school together. The draft plan would divide our neighborhood.
[end excerpt]
I've talked a lot about Paula Jean Park but have no doubt that every parent in this school loves it and is not willing to give it up easily.
[excerpt]
In 2003, my husband and I were looking to relocate. Our family was growing; we already had two boys and were in the process of adopting three more children. We needed a larger house. We lived in Beaverton at the time, but moved to the Hillsboro district in order to set down long term roots. We wanted a high quality district in which to raise our family. This year, all five of our children attend Indian Hills School. Currently, we have children in 6th, 4th, 3rd and kindergarten. We've worked with nearly every teacher in the building and have only positive experiences with the staff and principal. As you know, Indian Hills was rated "Exceptional". Of our three children who are old enough for the state benchmark testing, each have scored "Exceeds" in both math and reading. Indian Hills has been excellent for our entire family. Additionally, we have two children in IEPs and they receive their special education services at Indian Hills and two children who participate in TAG.
.....
We are part of the Shadowood Neighborhood. In Shadowood, we share a neighborhood park (across the street from our house) and a pool. The children of Shadowood enjoy the opportunity to play with one another in these settings, as well as attend school together. The draft plan would divide our neighborhood.
[end excerpt]
I've talked a lot about Paula Jean Park but have no doubt that every parent in this school loves it and is not willing to give it up easily.
Monday, November 19, 2007
Updated HSD Plan 3, showing tax lots
This is what will be shared at the Public Meeting tonight. I will be present to make sure everyone knows, still holding a INDIAN HILLS sign.
Pretty much my only comment will be "thank you" - I think the comments from the parents last Wednesday really made a difference. I didn't really even get to say anything meaningful to the committee. All that matters is the results, in the end.
NO HOME EXCLUDED FROM THE CURRENT 2007 BOUNDARY, add in the black border area is the only change.
HSD Plan 3 with tax maps, area in black is ADD (click to zoom)
Pretty much my only comment will be "thank you" - I think the comments from the parents last Wednesday really made a difference. I didn't really even get to say anything meaningful to the committee. All that matters is the results, in the end.
NO HOME EXCLUDED FROM THE CURRENT 2007 BOUNDARY, add in the black border area is the only change.
HSD Plan 3 with tax maps, area in black is ADD (click to zoom)
FLASH
Apparently the Boundary Committee is presenting PLAN 3, not currently shown here.
Go here for link (link)
All of the maps I show below are obsolete. Please review before the meeting.
I am checking them now.
[UPDATE - Original boundaries North of Rock Road and in Shadowood have been restored with addition on the East side of the current boundary still in place]
Go here for link (link)
All of the maps I show below are obsolete. Please review before the meeting.
I am checking them now.
[UPDATE - Original boundaries North of Rock Road and in Shadowood have been restored with addition on the East side of the current boundary still in place]
Hillsboro vs Aloha
When I first started looking at the boundary changes, I had an immediate, emotional reaction. My first thought was "We're being displaced by Hillsboro City kids." I even sent fliers to a couple people that took that viewpoint.
For a lot of us in Aloha, we have a bit of a confused civic identity, occupying an unincorporated twilight zone between 2 large incorporated cities. It also feels like we are sometimes looked down on by folks from Hillsboro. A few times when I told people that we were getting our elementary school boundary within the Hillsboro district moved the immediate response was "Oh no, are they sending your kids to Aloha?" That hurts.
After some time for reflection, I really can't say that I have ever suffered from being close to Hillsboro, actually the opposite is quite true. As a product of the Hillsboro School District, I know that our inclusion in the district has been nothing but a great thing so far.
Reflecting on my comments for tonight's meeting, I realized that Hillsboro vs Aloha isn't a constructive approach to the boundary issue. Whatever school the folks from the Hillsboro annex end up in, they will and should be welcomed with open arms, if anything our own anxiety about the boundary process should make us empathetic and if we feel that we have been slighted in the process, it wasn't their doing.
I am still concerned that the makeup of the boundary committee seems to be skewed toward principals from elementary schools exclusively from within Hillsboro city limits but I haven't quite figured out what area each committee member represents. It would be nice if the committee published each committee member's school affiliation so I didn't have to try and piece it together from my meeting notes or the district web site.
Side note: As an example of how we benefit by our proximity to Hillsboro, when a man was murdered in his car in the driveway of a nearby home (which is now excluded from the Indian Hills boundary N of Rock Road in "springboard" plan #1), the Washington County Sheriff's deputies responded immediately (link). But hot on their heels were K9 units from the Hillsboro PD - they worked tirelessly for hours trying to track down the killer who had invaded our neighborhood. The same teamwork was repeated just a few weeks ago when a young teen was assaulted while walking toward his Aloha home from Quatama Max Station (link). The Hillsboro PD K9 units and other officers responded immediately to assist WCSO.
[edit - order of post content adjusted. Also, I just noticed that the statement from the SO simply says that "A K9 unit responded but they were not able to locate the suspects", Come on guys, would it kill you to acknowledge that it was a Hillsboro unit that responded? When I heard the sirens I turned on my scanner and heard with my own ears that it was HPD K9 that assisted.]
For a lot of us in Aloha, we have a bit of a confused civic identity, occupying an unincorporated twilight zone between 2 large incorporated cities. It also feels like we are sometimes looked down on by folks from Hillsboro. A few times when I told people that we were getting our elementary school boundary within the Hillsboro district moved the immediate response was "Oh no, are they sending your kids to Aloha?" That hurts.
After some time for reflection, I really can't say that I have ever suffered from being close to Hillsboro, actually the opposite is quite true. As a product of the Hillsboro School District, I know that our inclusion in the district has been nothing but a great thing so far.
Reflecting on my comments for tonight's meeting, I realized that Hillsboro vs Aloha isn't a constructive approach to the boundary issue. Whatever school the folks from the Hillsboro annex end up in, they will and should be welcomed with open arms, if anything our own anxiety about the boundary process should make us empathetic and if we feel that we have been slighted in the process, it wasn't their doing.
I am still concerned that the makeup of the boundary committee seems to be skewed toward principals from elementary schools exclusively from within Hillsboro city limits but I haven't quite figured out what area each committee member represents. It would be nice if the committee published each committee member's school affiliation so I didn't have to try and piece it together from my meeting notes or the district web site.
Side note: As an example of how we benefit by our proximity to Hillsboro, when a man was murdered in his car in the driveway of a nearby home (which is now excluded from the Indian Hills boundary N of Rock Road in "springboard" plan #1), the Washington County Sheriff's deputies responded immediately (link). But hot on their heels were K9 units from the Hillsboro PD - they worked tirelessly for hours trying to track down the killer who had invaded our neighborhood. The same teamwork was repeated just a few weeks ago when a young teen was assaulted while walking toward his Aloha home from Quatama Max Station (link). The Hillsboro PD K9 units and other officers responded immediately to assist WCSO.
[edit - order of post content adjusted. Also, I just noticed that the statement from the SO simply says that "A K9 unit responded but they were not able to locate the suspects", Come on guys, would it kill you to acknowledge that it was a Hillsboro unit that responded? When I heard the sirens I turned on my scanner and heard with my own ears that it was HPD K9 that assisted.]
Sunday, November 18, 2007
The Value of Shoe Leather
The girls and I canvased part of the neighborhood today to make sure we were connecting with all parents in the area and to ask them to get involved in the process.
We found 3 families with 6 kids either going to Indian Hills now, or starting to attend next year. Two of those families had not heard about the boundary changes and were very concerned. I invited them to the meeting tomorrow night and asked them to get engaged.
What was really nice was the great support from the families that we talked to that had older kids in Brown or Century. They commented on how they would have felt to get kicked out of Indian Hills and one parent with no kids even asked if we had a petition that they could sign once I explained why we were walking the neighborhood.
We got drenched and frozen but a break for tomato soup and grilled cheese sandwiches helped get us re-energized. I had to reprint my map on waterproof map paper to keep the inkjet print from smudging, that is great stuff, like plastic paper you can print and write on.
Conclusion: People are just fundamentally nice, even when you show up dripping on their doorstep on a Sunday afternoon.
We found 3 families with 6 kids either going to Indian Hills now, or starting to attend next year. Two of those families had not heard about the boundary changes and were very concerned. I invited them to the meeting tomorrow night and asked them to get engaged.
What was really nice was the great support from the families that we talked to that had older kids in Brown or Century. They commented on how they would have felt to get kicked out of Indian Hills and one parent with no kids even asked if we had a petition that they could sign once I explained why we were walking the neighborhood.
We got drenched and frozen but a break for tomato soup and grilled cheese sandwiches helped get us re-energized. I had to reprint my map on waterproof map paper to keep the inkjet print from smudging, that is great stuff, like plastic paper you can print and write on.
Conclusion: People are just fundamentally nice, even when you show up dripping on their doorstep on a Sunday afternoon.
Meeting Notice - Community Meeting #1
Community Meeting #1 (calendar link)
November 19, 2007
(Monday, 7:00 to 8:30 p.m.)
Evergreen Middle School Library (map)
29850 NW Evergreen Road
Hillsboro, OR 97124
This is going to be the first "torch and pitchfork" meeting for the committee.
[edit - bumped up, how it works info in next post]
November 19, 2007
(Monday, 7:00 to 8:30 p.m.)
Evergreen Middle School Library (map)
29850 NW Evergreen Road
Hillsboro, OR 97124
This is going to be the first "torch and pitchfork" meeting for the committee.
[edit - bumped up, how it works info in next post]
Monday's Meeting - How It Works
Someone asked me tonight if the Public Meeting at Evergreen on Monday was just for folks from that area.
The answer is no, it is for all affected parents and it is important that we are getting our input into the Committee as soon as possible.
EARLY IN THE PROCESS IS BETTER
During the meeting last night someone on the committee made the comment that they can't consider folks concerns if they haven't given them the input - if you wait until the December 13 meeting at Brown to give your input, you have robbed the committee of almost a month of work considering your concerns.
BUNCH UP
They like it if a group from the school bunches together, it helps them bundle the concerns and not have to draw links from memory. I will show up as early as I can with a piece of paper that says INDIAN HILLS so we can gather in a common area, the intent isn't that I speak for you or vice versa, it just helps the committee make the logical connection about our school and area of concern.
SPEAK UP
If you plan on making a comment, please be sure to fill out a comment sheet, link is here. Even if you don't want to speak, fill out the sheet and turn it in.
Feel free to hold the comment sheet and read from it, it helps esp. if your emotions are running high. Be absolutely sure to turn the comment sheet into the committee afterward.
They ask for your name, the area of your concern (Indian Hills, Brown MS, Century) and what your statement is.
If you do chose to speak, they will record your info in the meeting minutes along with a summary of your comments but don't let that freak you out. Think about what is at stake.
BE REASONABLE
It can be cathartic to express how sad this makes you feel, what you think it will do to your home values, how senseless you think something is, wave your torch or shake your pitchfork, etc.
Fine, just please show the kids present that you understand the Indian Hills Character Traits:
Responsibility - Respect - Honesty - Integrity
Compassion - Courage - Patriotism - Civic Participation
The fact is, visceral reactions aren't relevant to the decision making process of the committee. They won't stop you from saying what you want, you will get lots of nods of approval from the rest of the parents, but your influence on the process will be almost nil. If you want to get something off your chest, send it to me on email and I'll post it here or I can show you how to start your own blog.
BE RELEVANT
The committee has been clear on what factors they feel are important to the process:
Some of the most effective arguments from the meeting last night, in my mind, were the ones from folks being given long drives to distant schools and how that added gas money was going to impact them yearly. It is real data, it is objectively measured in terms of impact, and it is relevant to the committee's concerns.
If you think there IS a relevant question that the committee isn't considering, please be clear on what the concern is, why you think that it is relevant to the process for ALL boundary decisions, and try not to focus on just your little slice of pie.
[edit - bumped up]
The answer is no, it is for all affected parents and it is important that we are getting our input into the Committee as soon as possible.
EARLY IN THE PROCESS IS BETTER
During the meeting last night someone on the committee made the comment that they can't consider folks concerns if they haven't given them the input - if you wait until the December 13 meeting at Brown to give your input, you have robbed the committee of almost a month of work considering your concerns.
BUNCH UP
They like it if a group from the school bunches together, it helps them bundle the concerns and not have to draw links from memory. I will show up as early as I can with a piece of paper that says INDIAN HILLS so we can gather in a common area, the intent isn't that I speak for you or vice versa, it just helps the committee make the logical connection about our school and area of concern.
SPEAK UP
If you plan on making a comment, please be sure to fill out a comment sheet, link is here. Even if you don't want to speak, fill out the sheet and turn it in.
Feel free to hold the comment sheet and read from it, it helps esp. if your emotions are running high. Be absolutely sure to turn the comment sheet into the committee afterward.
They ask for your name, the area of your concern (Indian Hills, Brown MS, Century) and what your statement is.
If you do chose to speak, they will record your info in the meeting minutes along with a summary of your comments but don't let that freak you out. Think about what is at stake.
BE REASONABLE
It can be cathartic to express how sad this makes you feel, what you think it will do to your home values, how senseless you think something is, wave your torch or shake your pitchfork, etc.
Fine, just please show the kids present that you understand the Indian Hills Character Traits:
Responsibility - Respect - Honesty - Integrity
Compassion - Courage - Patriotism - Civic Participation
The fact is, visceral reactions aren't relevant to the decision making process of the committee. They won't stop you from saying what you want, you will get lots of nods of approval from the rest of the parents, but your influence on the process will be almost nil. If you want to get something off your chest, send it to me on email and I'll post it here or I can show you how to start your own blog.
BE RELEVANT
The committee has been clear on what factors they feel are important to the process:
- What impact will the change make on the ethnic and socioeconomic composition of the student population?
- What impact in terms of “distance” will the change make on students and their families?
- Do the proposed boundaries provide for continued growth in the area?
- Are the proposed boundaries adversely impacting an area that has been repeatedly moved over time?
Some of the most effective arguments from the meeting last night, in my mind, were the ones from folks being given long drives to distant schools and how that added gas money was going to impact them yearly. It is real data, it is objectively measured in terms of impact, and it is relevant to the committee's concerns.
If you think there IS a relevant question that the committee isn't considering, please be clear on what the concern is, why you think that it is relevant to the process for ALL boundary decisions, and try not to focus on just your little slice of pie.
[edit - bumped up]
Saturday, November 17, 2007
Long Week
I have an outline of my comments for Monday but they are not nearly ready for review, I will try to get something out before end of day Saturday to those that have asked.
Checkers, our beloved dog of 14 years [edit - 15 years on Dec 5], has to be put to sleep tomorrow so it is going to be a tough day.
Camping trip, girls were 2 and 4 and Checkers was 7 years old.
Goodbye Check, rest well, we made some great memories together.
Checkers, our beloved dog of 14 years [edit - 15 years on Dec 5], has to be put to sleep tomorrow so it is going to be a tough day.
Camping trip, girls were 2 and 4 and Checkers was 7 years old.
Goodbye Check, rest well, we made some great memories together.
Friday, November 16, 2007
Straight Talk Link
Indian Hills Boundary News got a great write up today (link) from Hugh O'Donnell, Hillsboro District Board Member since 2003.
His blog is called Straight Talk and has all the makings of a good one with some nice personal notes about Hugh's father and Veteran's Day and then some hard punching exchanges with the Argus editorial board about the fate of the JB Thomas building.
He had lots of nice things to say about our activities here and clearly understands how powerful it can be as a way to communicate and congregate. I think his best advice is that school members actively participate in the blog, in comments, etc.
He is starting a list of community blogs so if you have a good link for him, I'm sure he'll be glad to have it.
Also, be sure to link him on any community website or blog you may have.
His blog is called Straight Talk and has all the makings of a good one with some nice personal notes about Hugh's father and Veteran's Day and then some hard punching exchanges with the Argus editorial board about the fate of the JB Thomas building.
He had lots of nice things to say about our activities here and clearly understands how powerful it can be as a way to communicate and congregate. I think his best advice is that school members actively participate in the blog, in comments, etc.
He is starting a list of community blogs so if you have a good link for him, I'm sure he'll be glad to have it.
Also, be sure to link him on any community website or blog you may have.
Notices In The Argus, Oregonian
Well, the committee obviously took everyone's input on notification about the process, there are 2 articles, one on the 14th in the Oregonian, then one on the 16th in the Argus. I still would like to see notes sent home with the kids from the schools. [edit - I just noticed that there was a notice in Nov. Indian Hills newsletter that came home with one of the girls, not sure if that was true for all schools, however]
My first thought is to ask the Argus why the district had to 'push' this info into the dead tree press? Is anyone on the staff assigned to keep in touch with district news? Why didn't the notice show up until the day of the 3rd public meeting? Another puzzling fact is that the article refers Beaverton parents to their district website but tells Hillsboro parents to call the Hillsboro district phone number. Why?
Evidently the Argus reporters were too busy dreaming about write-ups in the Culture section on the latest Modern Interpretive Dance Exposition at the proposed JB Thomas/Argus Community Arts Center to notice that every family in the district was being dramatically impacted by a boundary process.
Hillsboro, Beaverton school districts schedule boundary 'Listening Sessions'
11/16/2007
When school districts re-draw boundaries, students may be sent to different schools. Two West Washington County school districts are seeking public input on new school attendance boundaries during listening sessions with district superintendents. ...
New schools mean shifting students
11/14/2007
HILLSBORO -- If you live in the Hillsboro School District, your child could attend a different school next year. Construction of four elementary schools and a middle school has led to the redrawing of attendance boundaries. A district boundary com...
My first thought is to ask the Argus why the district had to 'push' this info into the dead tree press? Is anyone on the staff assigned to keep in touch with district news? Why didn't the notice show up until the day of the 3rd public meeting? Another puzzling fact is that the article refers Beaverton parents to their district website but tells Hillsboro parents to call the Hillsboro district phone number. Why?
Evidently the Argus reporters were too busy dreaming about write-ups in the Culture section on the latest Modern Interpretive Dance Exposition at the proposed JB Thomas/Argus Community Arts Center to notice that every family in the district was being dramatically impacted by a boundary process.
Hillsboro, Beaverton school districts schedule boundary 'Listening Sessions'
11/16/2007
When school districts re-draw boundaries, students may be sent to different schools. Two West Washington County school districts are seeking public input on new school attendance boundaries during listening sessions with district superintendents. ...
New schools mean shifting students
11/14/2007
HILLSBORO -- If you live in the Hillsboro School District, your child could attend a different school next year. Construction of four elementary schools and a middle school has led to the redrawing of attendance boundaries. A district boundary com...
The Danger of Extemporaneous Speaking
Minutes were just published from Wednesday's meeting (link here) and it got a little messed up in translation.
Here was my verbal statement as printed in the minutes (errors in red):
Mark Horton [edit - name fixed in updated minutes] (Indian Hills) — lives in a high-density area close to Tobias. He and his wife are products of HSD schools, and he came to the meeting to better understand and come up to speed on the proposal. He is concerned about issues affecting his area west of Cornelius Pass Road, and he speculated on whether the “springboard” was drawn with the intent of eliminating the high-density areas from the boundary. He even tried out his own adjustments and found his idea matches the current proposal.
My actual statement was that I lived north of Rock Road in a high density area and that I was being moved to Tobias in the current proposal. I don't know why they decided to write that I live close to Tobias since my house is less than 650 ft from Indian Hills. That isn't editorializing from the committee, is it?
I think I did say that I was worried about the west side of Corn Pass. D'oh. But I gestured with my right hand and if one is facing north that clearly means an easterly direction, right? I own that one and realized I had said it wrong after I sat down.
Now the puzzling one.
I haven't "tried out my own adjustments", those words did not pass my lips. I made it clear that I thought the current proposal eliminated high density areas from the IH boundary, not an approving statement. I also said I was still coming up to speed. Not sure how that makes sense to anyone with a shred of critical thinking ability; that I would both be coming up to speed and simultaneously completed "my own adjustments".
Maybe this was just a misunderstanding, here is a possible theory:
I cleared up the titles on the maps to be clear they are the HSD proposals just in case.
Whether my little fantasy is true or not, the fact remains that official committee minutes include a statement that is factually incorrect and wasn't based on anything that was spoken inside the Board room.
I will try to clear that up at the next committee meeting. Maybe I will wear a nametag.
In case someone from the committee is reading my blog, let me be clear: MY IDEAS DO NOT MATCH THE PROPOSALS. The proposals so far maximize the thrash to all of the schools in the Brown Middle School area. I haven't shared any ideas with the committee and I told Carlos after the meeting that I wanted to send him a PowerPoint file with my input.
From now on, everything I have to say goes in writing and I read from the statement. And when I hold up my right hand, that means East.
Here was my verbal statement as printed in the minutes (errors in red):
Mark Horton [edit - name fixed in updated minutes] (Indian Hills) — lives in a high-density area close to Tobias. He and his wife are products of HSD schools, and he came to the meeting to better understand and come up to speed on the proposal. He is concerned about issues affecting his area west of Cornelius Pass Road, and he speculated on whether the “springboard” was drawn with the intent of eliminating the high-density areas from the boundary. He even tried out his own adjustments and found his idea matches the current proposal.
My actual statement was that I lived north of Rock Road in a high density area and that I was being moved to Tobias in the current proposal. I don't know why they decided to write that I live close to Tobias since my house is less than 650 ft from Indian Hills. That isn't editorializing from the committee, is it?
I think I did say that I was worried about the west side of Corn Pass. D'oh. But I gestured with my right hand and if one is facing north that clearly means an easterly direction, right? I own that one and realized I had said it wrong after I sat down.
Now the puzzling one.
I haven't "tried out my own adjustments", those words did not pass my lips. I made it clear that I thought the current proposal eliminated high density areas from the IH boundary, not an approving statement. I also said I was still coming up to speed. Not sure how that makes sense to anyone with a shred of critical thinking ability; that I would both be coming up to speed and simultaneously completed "my own adjustments".
Maybe this was just a misunderstanding, here is a possible theory:
- I noticed that I was getting some visits from the k12.or.us domain just before the meeting.
- Someone from the committee could have had a link to my blog.
- They saw my interpretation of a district map labeled as "PROPOSAL" and thought it was MY proposal when it was really just me redrawing the HSD proposal with zoning areas shown.
- They were looking for the slightest bit of validation for their plan and seized on this as some sort of support.
I cleared up the titles on the maps to be clear they are the HSD proposals just in case.
Whether my little fantasy is true or not, the fact remains that official committee minutes include a statement that is factually incorrect and wasn't based on anything that was spoken inside the Board room.
I will try to clear that up at the next committee meeting. Maybe I will wear a nametag.
In case someone from the committee is reading my blog, let me be clear: MY IDEAS DO NOT MATCH THE PROPOSALS. The proposals so far maximize the thrash to all of the schools in the Brown Middle School area. I haven't shared any ideas with the committee and I told Carlos after the meeting that I wanted to send him a PowerPoint file with my input.
From now on, everything I have to say goes in writing and I read from the statement. And when I hold up my right hand, that means East.
Thursday, November 15, 2007
Big Mac Attack
It was great to talk with everyone at McTeacher's dinner tonight, it was really motivating and encouraging to get all the positive feedback. It was a little bittersweet though, thinking about what we have to lose.
Mrs. Wilson's grandaughter put on the hard sell (OK, not really, but that little apron is so cute) and we ended up with 5 bags of cookies.
And if anyone has a good picture of me chomping down on my Big Mac, let me know what it is going to cost to keep it out of the yearbook. I pay in cookies.
Mrs. Wilson's grandaughter put on the hard sell (OK, not really, but that little apron is so cute) and we ended up with 5 bags of cookies.
And if anyone has a good picture of me chomping down on my Big Mac, let me know what it is going to cost to keep it out of the yearbook. I pay in cookies.
New Feature - Email Forward
Every post now has a link with a little arrow envelope down next to comments that allows you to easily email a post to someone.
Please help get the word out.
Please help get the word out.
Who's Out? Who's In? #2 In A Series - The Importance Of Starter Homes
I just ran through assessment data and picked a value of $250k as the point at which someone looking for a home would have to start these days.
North of Rock Road and East of Powerlines:
40% of the homes are less than $250k assessed value
Hillsboro Annex:
14% of the homes are less than $250k assessed value
That is a huge difference in the makeup of the two areas. Why are we being sent to Tobias and the Hillsboro Annex is going to Indian Hills?
The demographics are going in the wrong direction.
Paula Jean Park is a neighborhood of what my dad called "crackerbox" homes when he was a drywall contractor, here in the neighborhood we like to refer to them as starter homes.
When we first looked at our house in 1993, we were just happy to finally be able to afford a house.
North of Rock Road and East of Powerlines:
40% of the homes are less than $250k assessed value
Hillsboro Annex:
14% of the homes are less than $250k assessed value
That is a huge difference in the makeup of the two areas. Why are we being sent to Tobias and the Hillsboro Annex is going to Indian Hills?
The demographics are going in the wrong direction.
Paula Jean Park is a neighborhood of what my dad called "crackerbox" homes when he was a drywall contractor, here in the neighborhood we like to refer to them as starter homes.
When we first looked at our house in 1993, we were just happy to finally be able to afford a house.
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Add/Remove Map (click to zoom)
OBSOLETE (see Nov 19 post, above)
HSD Proposal #2 showing tax lots (click to zoom)
HSD Proposal #2 showing tax lots (click to zoom)
New Maps, Boundary Update
OBSOLETE (see Nov 19 post, above)
Only change to the map was that they cut out the last remaining older high density area in the proposed boundary of Indian Hills, a chunk of R15 and a bunch of apartments next to Wendy's on 198th. This is evidently what will be presented at the first public meeting on Monday.
CURRENT (click to zoom)
HSD PROPOSED PLAN 2 with zoning (click to zoom)
HSD OFFICIAL MAP (from big pdf on HSD site)
This is Plan 1, my map above shows Plan 2 as described in the meeting.
Only change to the map was that they cut out the last remaining older high density area in the proposed boundary of Indian Hills, a chunk of R15 and a bunch of apartments next to Wendy's on 198th. This is evidently what will be presented at the first public meeting on Monday.
CURRENT (click to zoom)
HSD PROPOSED PLAN 2 with zoning (click to zoom)
HSD OFFICIAL MAP (from big pdf on HSD site)
This is Plan 1, my map above shows Plan 2 as described in the meeting.
Committee Work Session #2 Notes - Balloons In A Room
I went to the Boundary Committee Work Session #2 tonight and stayed until the bitter end, I really have to say that the volunteers on the committee are some hardy folks, it doesn't look like an enjoyable process.
There was a chance for public comment and I just introduced myself and expressed concern about how the new boundary appears to cut all high density zoning out of the Indian Hills Boundary.
There were some comments from a couple other parents, one of which brought a tear to my eye, it was such a passionate statement about the pride she takes in her home, in her school and that she makes sure her kids don't miss school because it is a privilege.
What really struck me the most about her statement was how closely her experience matches our own. She talked about how hard it was to find a house that was inside the Indian Hills boundary. I think that like my family it was a starter home, that is the kind of neighborhood we have here in Paula Jean Park, one of the few within the boundary that has affordable homes. She also talked about how they would drive by Indian Hills and she would tell her pre-school kids "That's going to be your school." Now they are crushed. We used to do the same thing with our girls when they were pre-schoolers.
Anyway, there was lots of talk about SES which stands for "SocioEconomic Status" which is basically another way of saying students who get free or discount lunches. What I want to know is what about those hard working parents that are socioeconomically disadvantaged but aren't willing to take a handout?
How does the district hear their voice if they don't consider other factors like home cost, zoning density or personal knowledge of the neighborhood?
Essentially the process consisted of drawing a loop around some new section of generic streets then having the GIS system spit out a headcount and SES percentage. Does it meet the goal, too high, too low. No demographer, no look at the actual homes or neighborhood characteristics.
More on the specifics later.
There was a chance for public comment and I just introduced myself and expressed concern about how the new boundary appears to cut all high density zoning out of the Indian Hills Boundary.
There were some comments from a couple other parents, one of which brought a tear to my eye, it was such a passionate statement about the pride she takes in her home, in her school and that she makes sure her kids don't miss school because it is a privilege.
What really struck me the most about her statement was how closely her experience matches our own. She talked about how hard it was to find a house that was inside the Indian Hills boundary. I think that like my family it was a starter home, that is the kind of neighborhood we have here in Paula Jean Park, one of the few within the boundary that has affordable homes. She also talked about how they would drive by Indian Hills and she would tell her pre-school kids "That's going to be your school." Now they are crushed. We used to do the same thing with our girls when they were pre-schoolers.
Anyway, there was lots of talk about SES which stands for "SocioEconomic Status" which is basically another way of saying students who get free or discount lunches. What I want to know is what about those hard working parents that are socioeconomically disadvantaged but aren't willing to take a handout?
How does the district hear their voice if they don't consider other factors like home cost, zoning density or personal knowledge of the neighborhood?
Essentially the process consisted of drawing a loop around some new section of generic streets then having the GIS system spit out a headcount and SES percentage. Does it meet the goal, too high, too low. No demographer, no look at the actual homes or neighborhood characteristics.
More on the specifics later.
Socio-economic Factors in 'Play'?
I was looking at the section of Hillsboro being added to the Indian Hills Boundary and noticed that the block of homes is immediately west of Hillsboro City Park & Recreation's Frances Street Park, literally across the street.
As I was looking at the images, it finally clicked on why Paula Jean Park is getting pushed out of the best elementary school in the area and these folks are getting pulled in.
Paula Jean Park has the biggest playground climbing structure in the area!
I guess they want to make sure that our kids don't get all the 'perks'. Seems like a reasonable argument but I hope we can at least have a discussion about it.
As I was looking at the images, it finally clicked on why Paula Jean Park is getting pushed out of the best elementary school in the area and these folks are getting pulled in.
Paula Jean Park has the biggest playground climbing structure in the area!
I guess they want to make sure that our kids don't get all the 'perks'. Seems like a reasonable argument but I hope we can at least have a discussion about it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
